cust.co / Companies / GitLab (GTLB)

GitLab NRR

Net Revenue Retention history for GitLab (GTLB) - Dev Tools, Public stage. Sourced from SEC filings and earnings releases.

Latest NRR · FY-2026
118%
All-time peak
130%
FY2021-Q3
All-time low
118%
FY2025-Q4
Disclosures tracked
16
since FY2021-Q3
QoQ flat
YoY ▼ 4pp
3-year ▼ 12pp

NRR vs GRR over time

0%37%75%112%150% FY2021-Q3FY2023-Q1FY2024-Q1FY2025-Q1FY2025-Q3FY2025-Q4FY2026-Q2FY2026-Q4FY-2026 Retention NRR (incl. expansion) GRR (excl. expansion) NRR - FY2021-Q3: 130% NRR - FY-2022: 130% NRR - FY2023-Q1: 130% NRR - FY-2023: 130% NRR - FY2024-Q1: 130% NRR - FY-2024: 130% NRR - FY2025-Q1: 129% NRR - FY2025-Q2: 126% NRR - FY2025-Q3: 124% NRR - FY-2025: 123% NRR - FY2025-Q4: 118% NRR - FY2026-Q1: 122% NRR - FY2026-Q2: 121% NRR - FY2026-Q3: 119% NRR - FY2026-Q4: 118% NRR - FY-2026: 118% GRR - FY2021-Q3: 0% GRR - FY-2022: 0% GRR - FY2023-Q1: 0% GRR - FY-2023: 0% GRR - FY2024-Q1: 0% GRR - FY-2024: 0% GRR - FY2025-Q1: 0% GRR - FY2025-Q2: 0% GRR - FY2025-Q3: 0% GRR - FY-2025: 0% GRR - FY2025-Q4: 0% GRR - FY2026-Q1: 0% GRR - FY2026-Q2: 0% GRR - FY2026-Q3: 0% GRR - FY2026-Q4: 0% GRR - FY-2026: 0%

Gross Retention excludes expansion - it shows pure churn / contraction loss. The gap between NRR and GRR is the expansion lift.

Peak NRR of 130% in FY2021-Q3. Latest is 118% - that's -12pp from peak.

GitLab is above the Dev Tools Public median by +0.5pp (cell median: 117%)

What the data shows

GitLab (GTLB) is a dev tools company at the public stage. As of its most recent disclosure (FY-2026), GitLab reported a Net Revenue Retention rate of 118% - a strong result for B2B SaaS at this segment.

GitLab's NRR peaked at 130% in FY2021-Q3, 12pp above today's level. Over the past three years, the metric has contracted by 12pp.

Within its peer set (dev tools companies at public stage in the $25k-$100k acv band), GitLab's NRR is roughly in line with the cell median of 117%. Compare against the full peer cell aggregate for distribution and top performers.

Customer mix

Total customers
10,682
2026-01-31
Over $100K ARR
1,405
2025-10-31
Over $1M ARR
-
US revenue mix
-
Top-10 concentration
-
Average ACV
-

Customer experience

Health scores, usage, and time-to-value when disclosed.

NPS
-
CSAT
-
Active users
-
Products per customer
-
Time to value
180 days

The post-sales motion

Pricing model
subscription
Renewal cadence
annual
CS team size
-
Customers per CSM
-

Support tiers: Premium · Ultimate

CS team segments: Strategic · Enterprise · Mid-Market · SMB · Public Sector

CSM model: account-named

Education programs: Professional Services

Top customer exec: Bill Staples - CEO (since 2024) · reports to CEO

What GitLab is doing

Named CS initiatives across recent disclosures (newest first).

What they're working through

Challenges acknowledged by management. Useful peer signals - your team is probably not alone.

What execs say about post-sales

Curated quotes about customer outcomes, retention, renewals.

"churning contraction... as a percent of available to renew, it was the best quarter we had in the last 12 quarters."
Brian Robins, CFO (Q&A Session)
"Ultimate creates a paradigm shift in how customers can embed security in the earliest stages of software development."
Sid Sijbrandij, Executive Chair (Prepared Remarks)
"We will focus on our expansion motions and helping customers realize the value of our platform faster"
Bill Staples, CEO (Prepared Remarks)
"Driving results for our customers is the most important thing we do."
Brian Robbins, CFO (Prepared Remarks)
"We want to ensure customers can easily collaborate and drive maximum ROI from their GitLab investment."
Bill Staples, CEO (Prepared Remarks)
"Q1 DBNRR was driven by a combination of seat expansion at approximately 80%, increased customer yield at approximately 5%, and tier upgrades at approximately 15%."
Brian Robbins, CFO (Financial Review)

Competitive dynamics

Compare GitLab to peers

Side-by-side NRR, customer cohorts, commercial structure, and CS motion.

Featured in these rankings

GitLab appears on 3 of our retention leaderboards.

Embed this chart

Free to embed on your blog or board deck. Includes a small backlink to cust.co.

<iframe src="https://cust.co/companies/gitlab/embed/" width="600" height="400" frameborder="0"></iframe>

Or grab the data: JSON API →

Every disclosure

Period NRR GRR Source type Filing
FY-2026 118% - 10-K source ↗
FY2026-Q4 118% - 10-K source ↗
FY2026-Q3 119% - 10-Q-mdna source ↗
FY2026-Q2 121% - 10-Q-mdna source ↗
FY2026-Q1 122% - 10-Q-mdna source ↗
FY2025-Q4 118% - def-14a source ↗
FY-2025 123% - 10-K source ↗
FY2025-Q3 124% - 10-Q-mdna source ↗
FY2025-Q2 126% - 10-Q-mdna source ↗
FY2025-Q1 129% - 10-Q-mdna source ↗
FY-2024 130% - 10-K source ↗
FY2024-Q1 130% - 10-K source ↗
FY-2023 130% - 10-K source ↗
FY2023-Q1 130% - 10-Q-mdna source ↗
FY-2022 130% - 10-K source ↗
FY2021-Q3 130% - 10-Q-mdna source ↗
Last verified disclosure: 2026-01-31 · Report an inaccuracy → · How we verify →

How does your NRR compare to GitLab's?

Generate a live retention report against GitLab and your full peer cell. Ungated. Downloadable as PDF.