cust.co / Compare / Q2 Holdings vs Riskified

Q2 Holdings vs Riskified - NRR head-to-head

Side-by-side Net Revenue Retention comparison sourced from SEC filings and earnings releases. Both compete in Fintech SaaS. Both at Public stage.

Q2 Holdings leads by +8pp on latest NRR (113% vs 105%).

NRR over time

93%99%105%110%116% FY2021-Q2FY-2023FY2024-Q4FY2025-Q3FY2025-Q4 NRR Q2 Holdings Riskified Q2 Holdings - FY2021-Q2: 113% Q2 Holdings - FY-2022: 110% Q2 Holdings - FY-2023: 108% Q2 Holdings - FY-2024: 109% Q2 Holdings - FY2024-Q4: 109% Q2 Holdings - FY2025-Q2: 109% Q2 Holdings - FY2025-Q3: 109% Q2 Holdings - FY-2025: 113% Q2 Holdings - FY2025-Q4: 113% Riskified - FY-2024: 96% Riskified - FY2024-Q4: 96% Riskified - FY2025-Q4: 105%

Q2 Holdings hit a higher all-time peak (113% in FY2021-Q2).

Stat-by-stat

Metric Q2 Holdings Riskified
Latest NRR 113% 105%
All-time peak NRR 113% 105%
All-time low NRR 108% 96%
QoQ change +0pp +9pp
YoY change +4pp -
3-year change - -
Disclosures tracked 9 3

Customer cohorts

MetricQ2 HoldingsRiskified
Total customers 460 -
Over $100K ARR - -
Over $1M ARR - -
Top-10 concentration - -
Average ACV - -
US revenue mix - 61%

Commercial structure

MetricQ2 HoldingsRiskified
Total RPO $2.7B -
Current RPO (12mo) - -
Multi-year contracts - 70%
Avg contract length - 24 mo
Subscription rev mix 82% -
New customers added - -

Post-sales motion

MetricQ2 HoldingsRiskified
CS team size - -
Customers per CSM - -
Pricing model subscription hybrid
Renewal cadence multi-year multi-year
CSM coverage model account-named -
Top customer exec Kirk Coleman -

How does your NRR stack up?

Compute yours in 30 seconds. Get a live retention report showing where you stack up, your expansion gap, and which public companies sit closest to your numbers.