cust.co / Compare / Pure Storage vs Confluent

Pure Storage vs Confluent - NRR head-to-head

Side-by-side Net Revenue Retention comparison sourced from SEC filings and earnings releases. Both compete in AI Infrastructure. Both at Public stage.

Confluent leads by +1pp on latest NRR (114% vs 113%).

NRR over time

112%114%115%116%118% FY-2025FY2025-Q4FY-2026FY2025-Q1 NRR Pure Storage Confluent Pure Storage - FY-2025: 117% Pure Storage - FY2025-Q4: 117% Pure Storage - FY-2026: 113% Confluent - FY2025-Q1: 114%

Pure Storage hit a higher all-time peak (117% in FY-2025).

Stat-by-stat

Metric Pure Storage Confluent
Latest NRR 113% 114%
All-time peak NRR 117% 114%
All-time low NRR 113% 114%
QoQ change -4pp -
YoY change - -
3-year change - -
Disclosures tracked 3 1

Customer cohorts

MetricPure StorageConfluent
Total customers 14,500 6,140
Over $100K ARR - 1,412
Over $1M ARR - -
Top-10 concentration - -
Average ACV - -
US revenue mix 64% 58%

Commercial structure

MetricPure StorageConfluent
Total RPO $2.9B $1.0B
Current RPO (12mo) - $620M
Multi-year contracts - -
Avg contract length - -
Subscription rev mix 42% 96%
New customers added 335 -

Post-sales motion

MetricPure StorageConfluent
CS team size - -
Customers per CSM - -
Pricing model hybrid hybrid
Renewal cadence multi-year annual
CSM coverage model - -
Top customer exec - -

How does your NRR stack up?

Compute yours in 30 seconds. Get a live retention report showing where you stack up, your expansion gap, and which public companies sit closest to your numbers.