Teams are switching not because Gainsight is bad.
Because AI changed what's possible.
They were hired to build relationships. But they spend 15+ hours per week on manual data entry and analysis.
Gainsight requires heavy manual configuration to do what should be automatic. Someone has to build the rules, maintain the integrations, and interpret the dashboards. That's why teams hire dedicated admins.
Cust reason for hours on how to drive value for each customer
This is reasoning, not rules. A rule-based system sees "usage down = bad." AI understands context, identifies patterns across your entire customer base, and recommends the right action.
| Gainsight | Cust | |
|---|---|---|
| Platform Cost | $40k-200k/year (depends on seats) | $18k-30k/year (unlimited seats) |
| Implementation | 6-12 months + $50k-200k professional services. Requires data warehouse setup and BI team involvement. | 2-3 weeks. One-click integrations with Salesforce, Linear, Stripe, Zendesk, Segment. No professional services needed. |
| Ongoing Management | Dedicated admin ($120k/year salary) to maintain rules, dashboards, and integrations | AI handles mapping, scoring, and playbook logic automatically |
| How It Works | You configure health score rules → You build dashboards → You interpret the data → You decide what to do | AI builds context → Looks up your guidelines in text → Identifies patterns across portfolio → Recommends specific action with reasoning |
| Scalability | 1 CSM per 50-80 accounts. Human analysis is the bottleneck. | AI analyzes every account daily. CSMs handle 150+ accounts by focusing only on high-priority actions. |
| Churn Detection | Reactive. Health score turns red → CSM investigates → Often discovers issue weeks after it started | Proactive. AI spots leading indicators before they impact health score: "Usage pattern matches 12 accounts that churned within 60 days. Here's what saved similar customers." |
| Insights | "Health score: 64/100" (You figure out why and what to do) | "At risk: Schedule call with CFO about ROI this week. They're evaluating competitors but haven't committed. 73% save rate when addressed within 7 days." |
Gainsight: $40k platform + $15k implementation + $25k fractional admin = $80k first year, $65k ongoing
Cust: $24k + zero implementation + zero admin = $24k ~70% less total cost of ownership
Not because Gainsight is bad. Because AI changed what's possible.
The #1 objection to switching: "We can't afford the disruption"
Run Cust in parallel with Gainsight for 30 days. If you don't see insights that would have saved at least one at-risk account, we'll refund 100%.